PEEBLES v PFIZER INC et al
| BECKY PEEBLES |
| PFIZER INC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC |
| 3:2025cv00446 |
| March 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by CYNTHIA LYNN GARBER on behalf of BECKY PEEBLES (GARBER, CYNTHIA) |
Filing 7
STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF GREENSTONE LLC AND VIATRIS INC. Greenstone and Viatris are DISMISSED without prejudice from all cases naming Greenstone or Viatris as a Defendant that are currently pending in MDL 3140, as more specifically identified in Exhibit A to this Order. This dismissal is effective fourteen days after the entry of this Order on the Plaintiffs' individual dockets, unless an objection is raised by individual counsel before that time. For any case naming Greenstone or Viatris as a Defendant that is transferred to, coordinated or consolidated with, or directly filed in MDL 3140 after the date of this Order, or that currently is pending against Greenstone or Viatris in this MDL but is not identified in Exhibit A, the Clerk of the Court must promptly docket a copy of this Order on the individual docket of such case. (see order image) Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/21/2025. Show Cause Response due by 7/7/2025. (djb)
|
|
Filing 6
STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PRASCO, LLC. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Prasco is DISMISSED from all cases naming Prasco as a Defendant that currently are pending in MDL 3140, identified in Exhibit A to this Order. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to docket a copy of this Order on the main MDL 3140 docket, and also on the individual docket of each case listed in Exhibit A. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/12/2025. (djb)
|
| Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against GREENSTONE LLC, PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC, VIATRIS INC, filed by BECKY PEEBLES. (GARBER, CYNTHIA) Modified on 7/10/2025 to take out PRASCO LLC. (not named) (djb). |
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Notice of Deficiency - The case caption on the Complaint does not comply with PTO No. 4, MDL No. 3140, and must be corrected by the filing of an Amended Complaint within 14 days. (Amended Complaint due on or before 4/22/2025.) (djb) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re: #1 Complaint. For future reference when adding party names during case opening, Alias (dba) "PRASCO LABS" can be added when PRASCO LLC is entered. (Alias has been added to docket) (djb) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Note to Filer - Nature of Suit is "367." Citizenship of Defendant is 5 (Incorporated/Principal Place of Business-Other State). The parties were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names shall be formatted using ALL CAPS and no punctuation unless the punctuation is part of the name. Clerk will correct Nature of Suit, citizenship. (djb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GREENSTONE LLC, PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC, PRASCO LLC, VIATRIS INC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-9421477.), filed by Becky Peebles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (GARBER, CYNTHIA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
