ALLEN v PFIZER INC et al
Plaintiff: DEBRA ALLEN
Defendant: PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Case Number: 3:2025cv00948
Filed: July 9, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by EDWARD F BLIZZARD on behalf of DEBRA ALLEN (BLIZZARD, EDWARD)
July 17, 2025 Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC, PHARMACIA LLC., filed by DEBRA ALLEN. (BLIZZARD, EDWARD) Modified on 7/17/2025 to correct parties (filed against) (djb).
July 11, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by JASON MICHAEL REEFER on behalf of GREENSTONE LLC (REEFER, JASON)
July 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF GREENSTONE LLC AND VIATRIS INC. For any case naming Greenstone or Viatris as a Defendant that is transferred to, coordinated or consolidated with, or directly filed in MDL 3140 after the date of this Order, or that currently is pending against Greenstone or Viatris in this MDL but is not identified in Exhibit A, the Clerk of the Court must promptly docket a copy of this Order on the individual docket of such case. It is hereby ORDERED that any Plaintiff in such a case will have 14 days from the date this Order is docketed in the individual case to show cause why the Court should not enter an Order dismissing Greenstone and Viatris from that Plaintiff's individual case, and Greenstone and Viatris will have 14 days from the date of filing of any show cause response to file a reply to any such response. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/21/2025. Show Cause Response due by 7/23/2025. (Order emailed to counsel of record, Edward Blizzard) (djb) Modified on 7/10/2025 to correct signature date (djb).
July 9, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING ATTORNEY ADMISSION. Non-Florida Bar members must seek pro hac vice admission. For this multidistrict litigation, please consult the modified admissions requirements described in Pretrial Order No. 4 (Case No. 3:25-md-3140, ECF No. 6 ). (notice and PTO No. 4, emailed to attorney of record, Edward Blizzard, Blizzard Greenberg, PLLC. re #4 Case Transferred In - District Transfer. (djb)
July 9, 2025 Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Texas Southern; Case Number 4:25-cv-02928. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
July 9, 2025 Filing 3 JPML CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-15) transferring case to Northern District of Florida to be included in MDL Docket No. 3140. (ltg4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/9/2025.]
July 9, 2025 Interdistrict transfer to Northern District of Florida. Case transferred electronically. (ltg4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/9/2025.]
June 25, 2025 Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bli4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/9/2025.]
June 25, 2025 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bli4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/9/2025.]
June 24, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-33645702) filed by Debra Allen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Blizzard, Edward) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/9/2025.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ALLEN v PFIZER INC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEBRA ALLEN
Represented By: EDWARD F BLIZZARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PFIZER INC
Represented By: JOSEPH G PETROSINELLI
Represented By: JESSICA BODGER RYDSTROM
Represented By: JEREMY CHASE BRANNING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Represented By: JOSEPH G PETROSINELLI
Represented By: JESSICA BODGER RYDSTROM
Represented By: JEREMY CHASE BRANNING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHARMACIA LLC
Represented By: JOSEPH G PETROSINELLI
Represented By: JESSICA BODGER RYDSTROM
Represented By: JEREMY CHASE BRANNING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?