KING et al v. PFIZER INC et al
| MICHELLE KING and TIM KING |
| PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC |
| 3:2025cv01116 |
| July 28, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ROGER C DENTON on behalf of MICHELLE KING (DENTON, ROGER) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JACOB EDWARD DILLON on behalf of MICHELLE KING (DILLON, JACOB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by RICHARD W SCHULTE on behalf of MICHELLE KING, TIM KING (SCHULTE, RICHARD) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Pursuant to 3:25-md-3140-MCR-HTC, 6 Pretrial Order No. 4, All attorneys seeking to appear in this MDL must file a Notice of Appearance in all individual cases in which the attorney is an attorney of record. Re #1 Complaint filed by TIM KING (djb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC, PHARMACIA LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-9560382.), filed by TIM KING, THE ESTATE OF MICHELLE KING. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SCHULTE, RICHARD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
