BAKER v. OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA et al
| BRENDA M BAKER |
| CHARLTON ERIC ESMOND, OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA, LARRY ASHLEY, ERIC ADEN, ERIC ESMOND, HEATH HEHL, KOURTNEY HOWARD, MELISSA WOODARD, JEREMIAH DOWDY, RYAN MCCURLEY and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 3:2025cv01552 |
| September 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered pursuant to #10 Order. (jfj) |
Filing 10
ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #7 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 10/27/25. (jfj)
|
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendations by BRENDA M BAKER. (jfj) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by BRENDA M BAKER. Current address: 7665 KIPLING STREET, LOT 13, PENSACOLA, FL 32514. (Clerk has updated address in case in CM-ECF.) (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #9 Objection to Report and Recommendations. (jfj) |
| Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is RECOMMENDED: That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii). That the clerk close the file. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 9/24/25. R&R flag set. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 10/22/2025.) (jfj) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #5 ) is GRANTED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 09/15/25. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis (jfj)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by BRENDA M BAKER. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (jfj) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Baker's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The clerk shall send Baker a complete set of forms needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (for non-prisoners). Case No. 3:25cv1552-TKW-HTC should be written on the forms. Baker shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to either file a proper motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $405 filing fee. Baker's failure to comply with this Order as instructed may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 09/10/25. (Fee due by 9/24/2025.) (Forms sent as directed.) (jfj)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (jfj) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by BRENDA M BAKER. (jfj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BRENDA M BAKER. (No service copies received. IFP Motion received.) (jfj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
