ZURAFF v. DUNCAN
| JOY ZURAFF |
| J SCOTT DUNCAN |
| 3:2025cv02179 |
| November 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #6 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Set/Clear Flags. (alb) |
Filing 6
ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #5 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) because the complaint fails to state a plausible claim and seeks relief from an immune defendant. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and close the case. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 05/01/2026. (alb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. (No objections filed.) (alb) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. This case be DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) because the complaint fails to state a plausible claim and seeks relief from an immune defendant. The Clerk of Court should be directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. - R&R flag set Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 11/10/2025. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/8/2025. (alb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is advised this case is now in the statutory screening stage, during which the Court is required to review Plaintiff's complaint to determine whether the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court will review Plaintiff's complaint as expeditiously as possible. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 11/6/2025. (alb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se. (alb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JOY ZURAFF. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J SCOTT DUNCAN, filed by JOY ZURAFF. (No service copies) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A.) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ZURAFF v. DUNCAN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOY ZURAFF | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J SCOTT DUNCAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
