MURPHY JR v. G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC
| JOSEPH MURPHY JR |
| G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC |
| 3:2025cv02622 |
| December 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER STAYING CASE. Based on Defendant's suggestion of bankruptcy (Doc. #8 ), it is ORDERED that: This case is STAYED under 11 U.S.C. 362(a). The parties shall file a status report on the progress of the bankruptcy case 120 days from the date of this Order (and every 90 days thereafter) if the automatic stay has not been lifted before then. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 04/24/26. Case stayed. (Status Report due by 8/24/2026.) (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #8 Suggestion of Bankruptcy. (jfj) |
| Filing 8 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to G3 Construction Group, Inc. by G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC. (WRIGHT, BYRON) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed on 4/2/2026 as to G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC by JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE (baf) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOSEPH MURPHY JR. G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC served on 4/2/2026, answer due 4/23/2026. (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. Upon due consideration of Plaintiff's motion to extend time for service (Doc. #4 ), the Court finds that there is good cause for the requested extension. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff has until April 30, 2026, to serve Defendant or to show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 3/11/26. (Deadline to serve Defendant - by 4/30/2026.) (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II notified that action is needed Re: #4 MOTION to Extend Time FOR SERVICE. (jfj) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Extend TimeFOR SERVICE by JOSEPH MURPHY JR. (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC. (jfj) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-9733002.), filed by JOSEPH MURPHY JR. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS - DEFENDANT) (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MURPHY JR v. G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOSEPH MURPHY JR | |
| Represented By: | CLAYTON MORRIS CONNORS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: G3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
