METHVIN v. SANTA ROSA COUNTY SHERIFF et al
| MEJZDA METHVIN |
| SANTA ROSA COUNTY SHERIFF, SUPERVISORY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and MEDICAL SERVICES PROVIDER |
| 3:2026cv00111 |
| January 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (No responses or objections filed/only pending Second Amended Complaint). (mb) |
| Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against JANE DOE, JOHN DOE (new defendant's added: TAYLER, HARWELL and GAYNOR, filed by MEJZDA METHVIN. (No service copies). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against JANE DOE, JOHN DOE (new defendant's added: TAYLER, HARWELL and GAYNOR, filed by MEJZDA METHVIN. (No service copies). (Pending REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION). (mb) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. #7 ) be DISMISSED without prejudice as an impermissible shotgun pleading. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 2/23/2026. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 3/23/2026. (mb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Declaration of MEJZDA SABRINA METHVIN, by MEJZDA METHVIN. (mb) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Declaration re #7 Amended Complaint, by MEJZDA METHVIN. (mb) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lieutenant Lukasik, Correctional Office Gaynor, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, filed by MEJZDA METHVIN. (No service copies.) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #7 Amended Complaint. (alb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by MEJZDA METHVIN. (New address: 5280 KENNSINGTEN PLACE, PENSACOLA, FL 32507). (mb) |
Filing 5
ORDER. Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #1 ) is STRICKEN as an impermissible shotgun pleading. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint on the Court-approved complaint form and mark it "Amended Complaint." Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a notice of voluntary dismissal within the same time. (Amended COMPLAINT due by 1/27/2026.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 1/13/2026. (mb)
|
Filing 4
ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Fee status updated to in forma pauperis. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 1/12/2026. (mb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, MEJZDA METHVIN. (mb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MEJZDA METHVIN. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, MEDICAL SERVICES PROVIDER, SANTA ROSA COUNTY SHERIFF, SUPERVISORY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, filed by MEJZDA METHVIN. (No service copies). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint (No service copies), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.