OSWALD v. SIMMONS et al
| CORY NOLE OSWALD |
| CHIP SIMMONS, NAD PANOZO-ROCABADA and GARDNER |
| 3:2026cv00451 |
| January 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| ALLEN C WINSOR |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT - DESTRUCTION OF ENTIRE HARD DOCUMENTS CASE FILE: ***After review and verifying that all documents have been scanned into the docket -- the entire hard documents case file has been destroyed.*** (kdm) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re #8 ORDER ADOPTING #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (kdm) |
Filing 8
ORDER ADOPTING #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE ALLEN C WINSOR on 4/6/2026. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, "This case is dismissed without prejudice under the court's inherent power to manage its docket and enforce the Local Rules, based on Plaintiff's failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history." The clerk will then close the file. (kdm)
|
| Set Deadline - Miscellaneous Deadline to destroy entire hard documents case file if no appeal is filed - by 7/6/2026. (kdm) |
| Filing 7 FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE (missing pages) re #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by CORY NOLE OSWALD. (mb) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - This case be DISMISSED without prejudice under the Courts inherent power to manage its docket and enforce the Local Rules,based on Plaintiff's failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. The Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 3/2/2026. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 3/30/2026. (mb) Modified on 3/3/2026 to correct signature date. (mb). |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CORY NOLE OSWALD. (mb) |
| Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against GARDNER, NAD PANOZO-ROCABADA, CHIP SIMMONS, filed by CORY NOLE OSWALD. (No service copies). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 FIRST Amended Complaint. (No service copies). Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (mb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for use by prisoners and the Court forms for seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk must include this case number on the forms. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must: a. file an amended complaint on the Court form AND b. either submit payment in the amount of $405.00 or file a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the Court form. (Amended complaint due by 2/17/2026., IFP/Filing Fee due by 2/17/2026.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 1/26/2026. (jcw)(Forms sent as ordered.)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant, CORY NOLE OSWALD. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GARDNER, NAD PANOZO-ROCABADA, CHIP SIMMONS, filed by CORY NOLE OSWALD. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/fee not paid). (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (No service copies/no IFP Motion/fee not paid). (mb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
