CARR v. PFIZER INC et al
| LAURA CARR |
| PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC and PHARMACIA LLC |
| 3:2026cv02128 |
| March 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from Gainesville Division Division on 03/18/2026 Case Number 1:26-cv-67. (djb) |
Filing 3
ORDER - The Clerk is hereby directed to assign all actions filed in, removed to, or transferred to this district which relate to or seek damages because of intracranial meningiomas allegedly caused by the use of Depo-Provera (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate), or a generic version thereof, to the undersigned in the Pensacola Division. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/13/2025.(Case will be transferred to the Pensacola Division by the Clerk) (djb)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by RUSTON JAMES PRITCHARD on behalf of LAURA CARR (PRITCHARD, RUSTON) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC, PHARMACIA LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-9831672.), filed by LAURA CARR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (PRITCHARD, RUSTON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.