NEAL v. WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA et al
| DANIEL NEAL |
| WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA and MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR |
| 3:2026cv03336 |
| April 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| T KENT WETHERELL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DANIEL NEAL. (Filed pursuant to #9 ORDER.) (jfj) |
Filing 9
ORDER. The order to show cause issued on April 16, 2026, (Doc. #7 ), is DISCHARGED. The Clerk of Court is directed to separately docket the amended complaint attached to Plaintiff's response to the order to show cause (Doc. #8 -1) as the "Second Amended Complaint." The Court accepts the Second Amended Complaint as the operative complaint in this case. Plaintiff has twenty-one days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be typed or legibly handwritten, submitted on the proper Court-approved form, and marked "Third Amended Complaint." Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a notice of voluntary dismissal within that time. Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the Court will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. (SEE FULL ORDER) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 05/13/26. (Third Amended Complaint or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal due by 6/3/2026.) (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #8 Response to Order to Show Cause. (jfj) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by DANIEL NEAL. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (jfj) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the Court. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 04/16/26. (Show Cause Response due by 4/30/2026.) (jfj)
|
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR, WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA, filed by DANIEL NEAL. (jfj) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #6 First Amended Complaint. (jfj) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint on the Court's form. Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the Court will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 04/08/26. (Amended Complaint due by 4/29/2026.) (jfj)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. (SEE FULL ORDER) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO on 04/08/26. (Fee status updated to in forma pauperis) (jfj)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to ZACHARY C BOLITHO. (alb) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DANIEL NEAL. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR, WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA, filed by DANIEL NEAL. (No service copies.) (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
