HALL v. PFIZER INC et al
| Sue Lynn Hall |
| PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC |
| 3:2026cv03357 |
| April 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Notice to Counsel, Michael Hochman. Pursuant to 3:25-md-3140-MCR-HTC, #6 Pretrial Order No. 4, All attorneys seeking to appear in this MDL must file a Notice of Appearance in all individual cases in which the attorney is an attorney of record. (djb) |
| Filing 7 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Notice to filer - Please note for future reference party names shall be formatted using ALL CAPS and no punctuation unless the punctuation is part of the name. The party name corrected by the clerk. (djb) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (HOCHMAN, MICHAEL) |
Filing 5
STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF GREENSTONE LLC AND VIATRIS INC. For any case naming Greenstone or Viatris as a Defendant that is transferred to, coordinated or consolidated with, or directly filed in MDL 3140 after the date of this Order, or that currently is pending against Greenstone or Viatris in this MDL but is not identified in Exhibit A, the Clerk of the Court must promptly docket a copy of this Order on the individual docket of such case. It is hereby ORDERED that any Plaintiff in such a case will have 14 days from the date this Order is docketed in the individual case to show cause why the Court should not enter an Order dismissing Greenstone and Viatris from that Plaintiff's individual case, and Greenstone and Viatris will have 14 days from the date of filing of any show cause response to file a reply to any such response. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/21/2025. Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2026. (djb)
|
|
Filing 4
STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PRASCO, LLC. For any case that names Prasco as a Defendant that is transferred to, coordinated or consolidated with, or directly filed in MDL 3140 after the date of this Order, or that currently is pending against Prasco in this MDL but is not identified in Exhibit A, the Clerk of the Court must promptly docket a copy of this Order on the individual docket of such case. It is ORDERED that any Plaintiff in such a case will have 14 days from the date this Order is docketed in the individual case to show cause why the Court should not enter an Order dismissing Prasco from that Plaintiff's individual case, and Prasco will have 14 days from the date of filing of any show cause response to file a reply to any such response. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 6/12/2025. Show Cause Response due by 4/17/2026. (djb)
|
| JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON added. (djb) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-9854496.), filed by Sue Lynn Hall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (HOCHMAN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL AVERY HOCHMAN on behalf of Sue Lynn Hall (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appearance PTO 4) (HOCHMAN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL AVERY HOCHMAN on behalf of Sue Lynn Hall (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appearance PTO 4) (HOCHMAN, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
