GREEN v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED INC et al
| Mary Green |
| COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED INC |
| 3:2026cv04578 |
| July 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ZACHARY C BOLITHO |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
PROTECTIVE ORDER re #15 ORDER. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/2/2026. (mb)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER. The Parties' request is GRANTED, and the Motion for Entry of Protective Order, ECF No. #13 , is APPROVED as modified above. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/2/2026. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #14 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (mb) |
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (PIPKIN, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED INC. (Attachments: #1 Protective Order) (PIPKIN, WILLIAM) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #13 Joint MOTION for Protective Order. (mb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to defendant FORSTER AND HOWELL INC. (mb) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant FORSTER AND HOWELL ONLY by MARY GREEN (CHILDS, EVIN) |
| Filing 11 First MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint by FOSTER AND HOWELL INC. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 8/13/2026). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Email Communications, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - First Report of Injury or Illness) (DYKES, HAYWARD) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by HAYWARD DYKES, JR on behalf of FOSTER AND HOWELL INC (DYKES, HAYWARD) |
| Filing 9 Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number DFLN300002508. Fee status updated to paid. (mb) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 7/31/2026. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/31/2026. Discovery due by 1/6/2027. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/17/2026. (mb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL. I recuse myself from this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(4) and Canon 3(C)(1)(c) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. The Clerk shall randomly reassign this case to another district judge. JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II recused. Case reassigned to JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS for all further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 7/10/2026. (mb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS notified that action is needed Re: #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Coca-Cola Bottling Company United Inc. (mb) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (PIPKIN, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 5 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED INC. Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.2, a complete and executed Civil Cover Sheet is required in each civil case filed. Please file the civil cover sheet using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings," "Other Documents." (alb) |
| Filing 4 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: Re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED INC. The filing fee for this case has not been paid. Please contact the Clerk's Office or submit a check in the amount of $405 Payable to the United States Clerks Office, for the filing fee. (alb) |
| Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: The parties in the above-referenced case were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names are to be entered in all caps and without punctuation. For future reference, please review the procedure for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide," available at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (mah) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by Coca-Cola Bottling Company United Inc.. (PIPKIN, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Coca-Cola Bottling Company United Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit CCBCU's Answer, #3 Exhibit Consent to Removal, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures) (PIPKIN, WILLIAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GREEN v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED INC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Green | |
| Represented By: | EVIN DYESS CHILDS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY UNITED INC | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM E PIPKIN, JR |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
