HICKS v. PFIZER INC et al
| MELISHA SMITH HICKS |
| PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA AND UPJOHN COMPANY LLC |
| 3:2026cv04751 |
| July 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| HOPE T CANNON |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by MELISHA SMITH HICKS. Amendment to #5 Notice of Appearance (FERRELL, JAMES) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES COLLINS FERRELL on behalf of MELISHA SMITH HICKS (FERRELL, JAMES) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JAMES COLLINS FERRELL on behalf of MELISHA SMITH HICKS (FERRELL, JAMES) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (FERRELL, JAMES) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: This case is not linked to the Lead Case, 3:25-md-3140. As a Reminder, when opening the civil case to create case association with the lead case please enter Lead case number 3:25md3140, Association type (Multi-district Litigation) and JPML no. 3140. Clerk will create case association. (djb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA AND UPJOHN COMPANY LLC, PHARMACIA LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AFLNDC-9980657.), filed by MELISHA SMITH HICKS. (FERRELL, JAMES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.