CONCEPCION-PADILLA v. THOMAS
Plaintiff: RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA
Defendant: FNU THOMAS
Case Number: 3:2026cv05424
Filed: November 9, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: ALLEN C WINSOR
Referring Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2026 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (jfj)
November 10, 2026 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jfj)
November 9, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU THOMAS, filed by RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA. (No service copies, fee, or IFP motion received.) (jfj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CONCEPCION-PADILLA v. THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?