CLIFTON v. MCDONOUGH et al
4:2005cv00358 |
September 23, 2005 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Tallahassee Office |
MAURICE M PAUL |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 ORDER denying 89 Notice of Appeal construed as a Motion for Certificate of Appealability 93 ; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 12/30/09. (tss) Modified on 2/9/2010 to indicate copy mailed to ECCA (tss) |
Filing 87 ORDER ADOPTING 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND 81 SUPPLEMENT and DENYING 20 PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS - 62 Motion for Leave to File and 63 Motion to Extend Time, both filed by HENRY CLIFTON, JR are DENIED and 85 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 10/29/09. (tss) Modified on 2/9/2010 (tss). |
Filing 81 SUPPLEMENT TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 62 MOTION for Leave to File filed by HENRY CLIFTON, JR: It is recommended - That Petitioner's "Motion for Leave And/or Delay of Any Further Court's [sic] Decisions&quo t;, construed as a motion for stay, be DENIED. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/23/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on June 25, 2009.(cc: Clifton) (cbj) |
Filing 79 ORDER re 77 Order, and 78 Response filed by HENRY CLIFTON, JR; - Within TWENTY (20) DAYS from docketing date of this order, Petitioner shall file with the court a complete and identical copy of the Complaint for Extraordinary Relief and Declaratory Judgment. Miscellaneous Deadline - by 6/3/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on May 14, 2009.(cc: Clifton) (cbj) |
Filing 73 ORDER re 72 Petitioner's "Motion for Response/Reply to the Court's Order" filed by HENRY CLIFTON, JR - Petitioner shall submit the information from the North Carolina Superior Court, as outlined in the body of this order, within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order. (Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 3/10/2009 . Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on February 18, 2009.(cc: Clifton) (cbj) |
Filing 70 ORDER - re 66 Order, 62 MOTION for Leave to File filed by HENRY CLIFTON, JR, 69 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION Petitioner shall submit the information from the North Carolina Superior Court, as outlined in the body of this order (see order image), within TWENTY (20) DAYS from the docketing of this order. Miscellaneous Deadline - by 2/10/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on January 21, 2009.(cc: Clifton) (cbj) |
Filing 67 ORDER re 66 Order, and 62 "MOTION for Leave and/or Delay of Any Further Court's Decisions" filed by HENRY CLIFTON, JR - Respondent, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, shall respond to Petitioner's motion within TWENTY (20) DAYS from docketing date of this order. Response to motion due by 1/19/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on December 30, 2008.(cc: Clifton) (cbj) |
Filing 61 ORDER granting 60 MOTION to Extend Time to File Objections filed by HENRY CLIFTON, JR - objections due by 10/31/2008; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 9/17/08. (tss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CLIFTON v. MCDONOUGH et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.