AQUINO v. MCDONOUGH
4:2006cv00318 |
July 10, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Tallahassee Office |
STEPHAN P MICKLE |
WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 22 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied; signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 8/10/09. (tss) |
Filing 30 ORDER re 28 Response to Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by WALTER A MCNEIL - Petitioner shall reply to Respondent's answer within THIRTY (30) DAYS from docketing date of this order. Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 6/28/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on May 29, 2009.(cc: Aquino) (cbj) |
Filing 27 ORDER 1. Petitioner's 20 MOTION to Amend his 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. 2. Within FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS from docketing date of this order, Respondent shall file an answer to the amended petition 22 . Internal deadline for referral to judge if response not filed earlier: 5/31/2009 . Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on April 16, 2009.(cc: Aquino) (cbj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AQUINO v. MCDONOUGH | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.