RUTH v. WHITEHURST et al
HARDY L RUTH |
WENDEL C WHITEHURST and BILL MCCOLLUM |
4:2007cv00108 |
March 15, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Tallahassee Office |
Gulf |
MAURICE M PAUL |
WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER denying 43 Motion for Certificate of Appealability and denying 45 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 7/23/10. (tss) |
Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 28 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING 34 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 1/05/2010. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1 ) challengi ng the convictions and sentences in State of Florida v. Hardy L. Ruth, in the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida, case number 02-4276, is DENIED and the clerk is directed to close the file. Counsel is directed to file a Notice of Appeal within the time limits established by the rules. After the filing of the Notice, counsel will be relieved as counsel of record in this case. (kdm) |
Filing 32 ORDER granting 31 Consent MOTION to Extend Time to file objections to report and recommendation filed by HARDY L RUTH (Internal deadline for referral to judge if objections not filed earlier: 9/8/2008); signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 9/5/08. (tss) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.