DAVENPORT v. ASTRUE
| TIMOTHY K DAVENPORT |
| MICHAEL J ASTRUE |
| 4:2008cv00416 |
| September 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office |
| Leon |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES. ACCEPTING 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Granting 40 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Secretary must pay $15,263.88 as attorneys fees under the Social Security Act, but the plaintiffs attorney must refund to the plaintiff $4,816.63 received as fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/23/12. (pll)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES. ACCEPTING 38 Report and Recommendation. GRANTING 36 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Commissioner must pay the claimant's attorney Heather Freeman $4,816.63. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 1/19/2010. (pll)
|
|
Filing
38
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs petition for attorneys fees be GRANTED and the court order that the Commissioner certify and pay to Plaintiff $4,816.63 as a reasonable fee, payable to Heather Freem an, Esq. re 36 MOTION for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act filed by TIMOTHY K DAVENPORT. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 12/4/09. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 1/1/2010. (pll)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER OF REMAND. ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Commissioner's decision determining that the claimant is not disabled is REVERSED. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the report and recommendation. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 7/8/09. (pll)
|
|
Filing
30
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, It is RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion for entry of judgment and remand, doc. 25 . The court DIRECT the Clerk to enter final judgment REV ERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits and REMANDING the application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) as to TIMOTHY K DAVENPORT : R&R flag set. ( Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 7/17/2009.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 6/19/09. (pll)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DAVENPORT v. ASTRUE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TIMOTHY K DAVENPORT | |
| Represented By: | HEATHER FREEMAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
