DAVIS v. MUKASEY, et al.,
| KIONE DAVIS |
| MICHAEL B MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL ROZOS, DAVID HARVEY and DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 4:2009cv00035 |
| January 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee Office |
| Wakulla |
| MAURICE M PAUL |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 Report and Recommendation; TERMINATING 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 4/15/2009. And the petition is DISMISSED as moot. (kdm)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by KIONE DAVIS: In light of the uncontested assertion by Respondent, and the apparent abandonment of this case by Petitioner, it is respectfully R ECOMMENDED that the § 2241 petition filed by Petitioner Kione Davis be DISMISSED as moot since it appears he has been released from detention. **ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION mailed to Petitioner at 1615 Ferrier Drive, Titusville, Florida 32780. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 03/16/2009. (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/13/2009.) (krb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
