ROBERTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al.,
| MARCUS WAYNE ROBERTS |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, HILLARY CLINTON, PATRICK F KENNEDY, JANICE JACOBS, ANN BARRETT and RYAN DOOLEY |
| 4:2009cv00075 |
| February 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Mandamus & Other Office |
| Calhoun |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 04/20/2009. (krb)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, re 1 Petition for Miscellaneous Relief filed by MARCUS WAYNE ROBERTS: In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's letter, doc. 3 , be CONSTRUED as a notic e of voluntary dismissal and that Petitioner's failure to respond to the court order, doc. 5 , be considered Petitioner's agreement with the dismissal of this action. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 03/12/2009. (Intern al deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/9/2009.) (krb) Modified on 3/13/2009 **ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION mailed to MARCUS WAYNE ROBERTS @ PO BOX 149 Clarksville, FL 32430. (krb).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
