CURTIS v. UNITED STATES
| ALAN BOYD CURTIS |
| UNITED STATES |
| 4:2009cv00076 |
| February 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Prison Condition Office |
| Jefferson |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER re 129 NOTICE of Inquiry/NOTICE of No Response to Client by Counsel by ALAN BOYD CURTIS. Case is currently on appeal w/Eleventh Circuit which now maintains the filings related to this case. No Notice of Appearance on behalf of Plaintiff has been filed with the District Court in this matter. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 12/28/2011. (jws)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER re 118 Motion to Waive Appeal Filing Fee as a Collateral Criminal Action filed by ALAN BOYD CURTIS is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 10/21/2011. (jws) Transmitted to USCA via email.
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Adopting 93 Report and Recommendation - Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 7/29/2011. (jws)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER DENYING 73 OBJECTIONS by ALAN BOYD CURTIS to modify or set aside any part of the 67 Magistrate Judge's Order. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 1/6/2011. (jws)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 9 Report and Recommendation. Signed by JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 6/04/2009. Plaintiffs complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can b e granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and thereby constitutes a strike within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). (kdm)
|
|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, It is RECOMMENDED that 8 Amended Complaint filed by ALAN BOYD CURTIS be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), and that the order adopt ing this report and recommendation direct the Clerk of Court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 4/23/09. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/21/2009. (pll)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CURTIS v. UNITED STATES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ALAN BOYD CURTIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
