HASTINGS v. CRIST
||JEFFREY R HASTINGS
||March 2, 2009
||US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
||Constitutional - State Statute Office
||STEPHAN P MICKLE
||WILLIAM C SHERRILL
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:1331 Fed. Question
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 8, 2009
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 9 Report and Recommendation; DENYING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 7/08/2009. This case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The clerk shall note on the docket that the dismissal is also ordered under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious and an abuse of the judicial process. (kdm)
|April 16, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint, filed by JEFFREY R HASTINGS, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis :It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's mot ions seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, docs. 2 and 8 , be DENIED and this case should be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). It is further RECOMMENDED that the order adopting this report and recommendation direct the Clerk of Court to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed as malicious and an abuse of the judicial process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/14/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR on 04/16/09. (dlt)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?