ANDERSON v. LOFLAND
Plaintiff: GEOFFREY H ANDERSON
Defendant: HOLLY LOFLAND, ANDREW DAWSON and TIM RUTH
Case Number: 4:2009cv00134
Filed: April 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Leon
Presiding Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM C SHERRILL
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ACCEPTING 106 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Granting in part 94 AND 95 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk must enter judgment stating: Judgment on the merits on the federal claims is entered in favo r of the defendant Larry Campbell in his official and individual capacities and in favor of the defendants Carl Bennett, Tim Ruth, and Andrew Dawson in their individual capacities. Those claims are dismissed with prejudice. The state-law claims a gainst Mr. Campbell, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Ruth, and Mr. Dawson are dismissed based on the discretionary decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. The federal official-capacity claims against Mr. Bennett, Mr. Ruth, and Mr. Dawson are dismisse d as redundant. The claims against the defendants Edith Brandt and J. McFarland are dismissed without prejudice for failure to service process and failure to prosecute. The claims against the defendant Jennifer Frost and all defendants named in pr ior versions of the plaintiffs complaintincluding Holly Lofland, Jerry Dent, Deborah Linton, Harvery Carruth, and Kim Petersonare voluntarily dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Any other claims against any other defendants are dismissed. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/28/11. (pll)
June 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT JENNIFER FROST. ACCEPTING 93 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.The plaintiff's claims against the defendant Jennifer Frost are voluntarily dismissed. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 6/18/11. (pll)
April 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER AWARDING SANCTIONS AND GIVING THE PLAINTIFF A FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR FOR HIS DEPOSITION. ACCEPTING 77 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. DENYING 66 Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiff must pay the defendant $995 in expenses. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 4/16/11. (pll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANDERSON v. LOFLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GEOFFREY H ANDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOLLY LOFLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW DAWSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIM RUTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?