FERENC v. HAYNES
| JOHN MICHAEL FERENC |
| STACEY HAYNES |
| 4:2010cv00138 |
| April 19, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The clerk must enter judgment stating, The plaintiff John Michael Ferencs claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 3/24/12. (pll)
|
Filing
13
ORDER REMANDING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/9/2010. (pll)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FERENC v. HAYNES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN MICHAEL FERENC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STACEY HAYNES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.