SELDEN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY
Plaintiff: GLENN LEE SELDEN
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY
Case Number: 4:2010cv00143
Filed: April 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Volusia
Presiding Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Report and Recommendation 38 is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court's opinion. The complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/25/2010. (dlt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SELDEN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GLENN LEE SELDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?