JOHNSTON v. MCNEIL
| GEORGE RAYMOND JOHNSTON, III |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BALDRIDGE, WALTER MCNEIL, GLENN E YOUNG, BOZEMAN and BENITO EDOUARD |
| 4:2011cv00021 |
| January 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| MAURICE M PAUL |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part 112 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, granting 98 Motion for Summary Judgment and directing the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of the Defendants; signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/28/14. (tss)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER adopting 75 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and MOTION to Dismiss.. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/7/2012. The claims agains t Defendant Edouard and Baldridge are DISMISSED for failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies. Defendants motion to dismiss is DENIED with regard to Plaintiff's First and Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Young and Bozeman in their individual capacities only and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings. (kdm)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; DENYING 2 , 8 Motions for Emergency Injunction. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 3/17/2011. (kdm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
