HANCOCK BANK v. MONTE CRISTO OF TALLAHASSEE INC et al
| HANCOCK BANK |
| HOSSEIN GHAZVINI, BEHZAD GHAZVINI, MONTE CRISTO OF TALLAHASSEE INC, MONTE CRISTO OF TALLAHASSEE NO 1 LLC, MONTE CRISTO OF TALLAHASSEE NO 2 LLC, MONTE CRISTO OF TALLAHASSEE NO 3 LLC, MONTE CRISTO OF TALLAHASSEE NO 4 LLC and MEHRAN P GHAZVINI |
| 4:2011cv00282 |
| June 13, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 40 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 10/18/2011. (jcw)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denied w/o prejudice 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/19/2011. (sea)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granted 30 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plas Motion for Final Summary Judgment. Dfts shall file their response not later than 9/16/2011. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 9/8/2011. (sea)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Pla's Complaint 12 is GRANTED. Dfts shall file their response not later than August 15, 2011. (answers due by 8/15/2011). Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 8/10/2011. (sea)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
