CHARRIEZ v. BUSS
| JOSE M CHARRIEZ |
| DANIEL BANNISTER, E STINE, MARK GARCIA and EDWIN BUSS |
| 4:2011cv00379 |
| August 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| WILLIAM C SHERRILL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER ADOPTING 66 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant Garcia's motion for summary judgment, doc. 59 , is GRANTED and the Clerk shall enter judgment in his favor on all claims. Plaintiff's Rule 60 motion to reinstate his claims against Defendant Bannister, doc. 60 , is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/31/2014. (sdw)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER adopting 46 Report and Recommendation; granting in part 39 Motion to Dismiss claims against Defendants Bannister and Stine. Defendants' motion to dismiss 39 is DENIED in part as to plaintiff's claim against Defendant Garcia. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on plaintiff's claim against Defendant Garcia. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/25/2013. (atm)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 16 Report and Recommendation. ; denying 12 MOTION for Restraining Order. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 2/21/2012. This case is remanded for further proceedings. (kdm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
