CATLIN v. MCNEIL
| REGINALD AL CATLIN |
| MCNEIL, CHARLES D TERRELL, KATHLEEN FUHRMAN and A THIGPEN |
| 4:2011cv00624 |
| December 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Taylor |
| GARY R JONES |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.. The plaintiff's complaint (doc. 1 ) and this action are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim." Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 4/20/12. (pll)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by REGINALD AL CATLIN: Clerk directed to send Plaintiff a blank prisoner civil rights complaint form and instructions. Plaintiff shall fully complete and file amended complaint w/identical copy for each Defendant. (Amended Pleadings due by 3/23/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 2/28/2012. (jws) (Form to Plaintiff per Order.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by REGINALD AL CATLIN on improper form. Clerk directed to send Plaintiff a blank IFP motoin for use by a prisoner. ( Motion for IFP due by 1/13/2012.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 12/16/2011. (Blank form per order sent to Plaintiff.)(jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
