FULWOOD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
| LENNIE FULWOOD |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER TALLAHASSEE |
| 4:2012cv00156 |
| April 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's 29 Fourth Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to all claims except plaintiff's First Amendment claims against ARNOLD and PRITT. Plaintiff's 29 request for this case to proceed as a class action suit is DENIED. Plaintiff shall file a fifth amended complaint limited to his First Amendment claims against ARNOLD and PRITT. Case is REMANDED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.(Amended Pleadings due by 3/15/2013.). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/19/2013. (jws)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER: Magistrate judge's 20 order is AFFIRMED and ACCEPTED by this COURT. 21 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by LENNIE FULWOOD is DENIED. Plaintiff to file Third Amended Complaint. Case is referred to magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Amended Pleadings due by 11/16/2012.). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 10/25/2012. (jws)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
