WATKINS v. SCOTT, et al.,
| JOHN E WATKINS |
| RICK SCOTT, KENNETH TUCKER, EMANUEL, DAWKINS, MARTIN, KLEOPATRICK, RICKET, ALEX TAYLOR, JIMMY COKER, S RODENBERRY and M CLEMMONS |
| 4:2012cv00215 |
| April 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Wakulla |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The report and recommendation, ECF No. 88 , is accepted in part. The summary-judgment motions, ECF Nos. 76 and 84 , are granted in part and denied in part. Any other claims are dismissed with prejudice. The clerk must enter judgment and close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 9/15/2015. (tdl)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER ON SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The second report and recommendation, ECF No. 55 , is ACCEPTED and adopted as the courts opinion. The defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 47 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The claims against the defendant S. Fox and the prayer-oils claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 5/9/2014. (tdl)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 41 Motion for Leave to File & 42 Motion for Injunctive Relief. The 46 report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court's opinion. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 10/11/2013. (tdl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
