WHITE v. WAKULLA COUNTY FLORIDA, et al
| DEXTER WANZEL WHITE |
| WAKULLA COUNTY FLORIDA, R DIXON, S MILLIKEN, N SANDERS SAULS, A KENT, CHARLES L KNIGHT and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 4:2012cv00368 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Wakulla |
| GARY R JONES |
| STEPHAN P MICKLE |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 20 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by DEXTER WANZEL WHITE - Fee due by 1/28/2013; signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 12/28/12. (tss)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this case be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim and 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune and denying 10 Motion for Leave to File; signed by SENIOR JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 11/27/12. (tss)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 8 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by DEXTER WANZEL WHITE and denying 3 MOTION For Preliminary Declaratory of Injunctive Relief - copy of order mailed to Inmate Accounts, Wakulla CI per Order; signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES on 11/6/12. (tss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
