GIBSON v. DOE
| DERRICK L GIBSON, SR |
| JOHN DOE and MICHAEL D CREWS |
| 4:2013cv00117 |
| March 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| MARK E WALKER |
| GARY R JONES |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER CONSIDERING OBJECTIONS DE NOVO, TREATING THEM AS A MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT, AND DENYING THE MOTION - The plaintiff's objections, ECF No. 35 , are deemed timely. Upon de novo review of the issues raised by the objections, the report and recommendation is again accepted and adopted as the courts opinion. In addition to being treated as objections, the plaintiff's objections are also deemed a motion to alter or amend the judgment. The motion to alter or amend is denied. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/8/2014. (dlt)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 19 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, ECF No. 26 , is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's federal claims are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's state law claim is dismissed without prejudice." Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/22/2014. (dlt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
