MCCROAN v. MORGAN, et al
| WILLIAM TONY MCCROAN |
| MARGUERITE J MORGAN and ADAM SMITH |
| 4:2013cv00370 |
| June 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Gadsden |
| MARK E WALKER |
| GARY R JONES |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER ACCEPTING 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, ECF No. 59 , is DENIED because this Court finds that the appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 7/2/2014. (tdl)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER ACCEPTING 55 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's claims against Joseph Smith and Joseph Chason are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted." Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 6/19/2014. (tdl)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Defendant Morgan's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 26 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Morgan are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety." This cause is remanded to the Magistrate for further proceedings and for review of Plaintiff's objections, ECF 46 , wherein Plaintiff moves for entry of a default judgment against Chief Smith. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 4/16/2014. (tdl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
