CHARLES v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
BALLENGER CHARLES, JR |
WILLIAM AVERY, GLENN BASSETT, VICTOR NEAL, PATRICK KELLY, ROBERT HANNAH, STATE OF FLORIDA, THOMAS RYBCZYK, CATHY CHRISTENSEN, DAVID LEWIS and JAMES SIGMAN |
4:2013cv00467 |
August 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Tallahassee Office |
Leon |
ROBERT L HINKLE |
CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER EXTENDING THE DISCOVERY AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEADLINES - GRANTED 34 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery filed by BALLENGER CHARLES, JR. ( Dispositive Motions to be filed by 6/21/2014., Discovery due by 6/1/2014., Jury Trial set for 8/4/2014 08:15 AM in U.S. Courthouse Tallahassee before JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE. The pretrial conference remains scheduled for July 15, 2014.) Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 4/23/2014. (dlt) |
Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT - The defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 10 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The federal claims against the State of Florida Office of the Attorney General are dismissed. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint by December 18, 2013. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 12/4/2013. (dlt) |
Filing 23 ORDER CONFIRMING THE SCHEDULE re 19 Scheduling and Mediation Order remains in effect. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/16/2013. (dlt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.