LONERGAN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
| DANIEL R LONERGAN |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL D CREWS and PAMELA JO BONDI |
| 4:2014cv00042 |
| January 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| MARK E WALKER |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 77 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 64 , and Defendant's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 66 , are DENIED because there are genuine disputes of material fact. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings prior to setting the case for trial. Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 3/30/2017. (tdl)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 15 Order Report and Recommendation Signed by JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 5/29/2014 (The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff's objections, as this Courts op inion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, This cause is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be grantedpursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk shall note on the docket that this cause is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)." The Clerk shall close the file.) (dc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
