GEE v. JONES
4:2016cv00211 |
January 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Tallahassee Office |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The report and recommendation 30 is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner's objections, as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "T he petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Jerome Gee, Leon County Circuit Court Case No. 2005-CF-1524, is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/17/19. (amm) |
Filing 43 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 30 : The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1 , challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Jerome Gee, Leon County Circuit Court Case No. 2005-CF-1524, is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED." The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/8/19. (amm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: GEE v. JONES | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.