MATHEWS v. JONES et al
| CECIL MATHEWS |
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY and SHANNON MILLIKEN |
| 4:2016cv00375 |
| June 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Jefferson |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The 72 second report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 61 , is denied. The defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 64 , is granted. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "This action was resolved on a summary-judgment motion. It is adjudged that the plaintiff Cecil Mathews recover nothing on his claims against the defendants Mark S. Inch, in his capacity as Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, and Shannon Milliken. The claims are dismissed on the merits." The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 08/22/2019. (toy)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO CERTIFY A CLASS - The 23 report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The motion to certify a class, ECF No. 22 , is denied. The case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/17/2017. (tdl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
