LAPUMA v. COUCH et al
| PERRY T LAPUMA |
| J COUCH, K LIGHTFOOT, C SIMCOX, A BUCARELLI, C KENDRICK and JOHN DOE |
| 4:2016cv00799 |
| December 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Taylor |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 48 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. The plaintiff's fifth amended complaint and this action are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed." The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 56 ) to appoint counsel is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 5/2/2019. (cle)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'SMOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court. The plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (doc. 19 ) is DENIED. The clerk shall return the case to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 10/5/2017. (cle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
