HARDIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner: JOSHUA NEEL HARDIN
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Number: 4:2017cv00262
Filed: June 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Tallahassee Office
County: Suwannee
Presiding Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Presiding Judge: GARY R JONES
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "This case is dismissed without prejudice." The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 11/11/2017. (tdl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARDIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSHUA NEEL HARDIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?