MERCER v. WAL-MART STORES
| TAMMY MERCER |
| WAL-MART CORPORATION and WAL-MART STORES |
| 4:2018cv00356 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Alachua |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| MARK E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Intradistrict Transfer to Gainesville Division, 401 SE First Ave., Gainesville, FL 32601. Case # assigned 1:18cv145-MW-GRJ. (ckm) |
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO GAINESVILLE DIVISION (re #2 Complaint) - Plaintiff's motion to transfer, ECF No. #4 , is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to take all necessary steps to effectuate the transfer of this case to the Gainesville Division. The Clerk is directed to close this case in the Tallahassee Division. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 8/1/2018. (ckm)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Move Case to Gainesville Division by TAMMY MERCER. (ROMANO, JAY) Modified on 7/31/2018 to reflect document title (ckm). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE filing AMENDED CIVIL COVER by TAMMY MERCER re #2 Complaint (ROMANO, JAY) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against WAL-MART CORPORATION, filed by TAMMY MERCER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ROMANO, JAY) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TAMMY MERCER. (ROMANO, JAY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
