OSBORNE v. BJ'S RESTAURANTS INC
| Shaena Osborne |
| BJ'S RESTAURANTS, INC. and BJ'S RESTAURANTS INC |
| 4:2018cv00390 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Tallahassee Office |
| Leon |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Labor: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION to Stay re #4 MOTION to Vacate Default and Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration by BJ'S RESTAURANTS INC. (DEBLASIO, PATRICK) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by BJ'S RESTAURANTS INC. (DEBLASIO, PATRICK) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE notified that action is needed re: #5 Initial Scheduling Order. The deadline to file Corporate Disclosure Statement has expired. No Disclosure Statement has been filed. (cle) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Vacate Default and Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration filed by SHAENA OSBORNE. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
Filing 10
SECOND ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION TO VACATE THE DEFAULT - The plaintiff's unopposed motion, ECF No. #9 , to extend the deadline to respond to the motion to vacate the default, to stay proceedings, and to compel arbitration is granted. The deadline is extended to 9/18/2018). Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 9/13/2018. (vkm)
|
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #4 MOTION to Vacate - Consented, filed by SHAENA OSBORNE. (GOODMAN, ERIKA) Modified on 9/13/2018 to correct document title. (kjw) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE #4 MOTION TO VACATE THE DEFAULT (Response to motion due by 9/12/2018). Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 9/10/2018. (vkm)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by SHAENA OSBORNE. (MATTOX, MARIE) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON RULE 26(f) OBLIGATIONS. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/29/2018. (cle)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER - Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 9/12/2018. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/12/2018. Discovery due by 12/18/2018. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 8/29/2018. (cle)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Vacate Default and Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration by BJ'S RESTAURANTS INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (DEBLASIO, PATRICK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIKA ESAN GOODMAN on behalf of SHAENA OSBORNE (GOODMAN, ERIKA) |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: To Attorney DEBLASIO - re: #1 Notice of Removal. A reminder that party names (including aliases) are to be added using all caps and no punctuation. (See "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing," available on Clerk's website.) The party names will be corrected by the clerk. Further, counsel is advised by this entry, that a Civil Cover Sheet must be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents". (cle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BJ'S RESTAURANTS, INC. from Leon County Circuit Court, case number 17-001830. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4263631.), filed by BJ'S RESTAURANTS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (DEBLASIO, PATRICK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
