SMITH v. SPM LLC
| LAWRENCE SMITH |
| SPM LLC |
| 4:2018cv00396 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| MARK E WALKER |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE Regarding Electronic Filing and Attorney Admissions Requirement to Attorney Alvarez (re #1 Notice of Removal). (ckm) ***Notice and Attorney Admissions Memo emailed to Attorney Alvarez*** |
| Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT TO ATTORNEY YENCARELLI Re #1 Notice of Removal: The parties named in the above-referenced document were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names (including aliases) are to be added using all caps and no punctuation. Counsel is also advised that a Civil Cover Sheet should be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents." For future case openings, please review the procedures for opening a civil case in the Guide: Civil Case Opening By Attorneys and/or Chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide" (both available on the clerk's website). (Click on CM/ECF link and go to General Info.)For future reference, please review the procedures for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or Chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide" (both available on the clerk's website) at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (Click on CM/ECF link and go to General Info.) (ckm) Modified on 8/24/2018 to add language regarding Civil Cover Sheet (ckm). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SPM, LLC from Second Judicial Circuit Court in and for Leon County, Florida, case number 2018-CA-000607. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4269038.), filed by SPM, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit Exhibit X, #25 Exhibit Exhibit Y) (YENCARELLI, JENNIFER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMITH v. SPM LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LAWRENCE SMITH | |
| Represented By: | JAMES GARRETT BIGGART, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SPM LLC | |
| Represented By: | JENNIFER NICOLE YENCARELLI |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
