PRINGLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner: GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
Case Number: 4:2018cv00475
Filed: October 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: CHARLES A STAMPELOS
Referring Judge: MARK E WALKER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (amm)
November 30, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order by GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV. (amm)
November 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO AMENDED 2254 PETITION. Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition on or before 2/19/2019. Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, no later than 3/21/2019. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 11/19/18. *Copies served as directed. (amm)
November 16, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (amm)
November 15, 2018 Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV. *2 service copies provided. (amm)
October 30, 2018 Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, receipt number FLN400035302. Fee status updated to paid. (cle)
October 30, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed re: 4 Filing Fee Received. (cle)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - The Clerk of Court shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed IFP (IFP/Fee due by 11/26/2018). The Clerk shall forward four 2254 forms to Petitioner, writing the case number on the blank forms (Amended Petition due by 11/26/2018. Notify Chambers on 11/26/2018). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 10/25/2018. (vkm)***FORMS PROVIDED AS DIRECTED***
October 24, 2018 Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se. (vkm)
October 24, 2018 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (vkm)
October 22, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV. (vkm)***NO FEE/IFP, NO SERVICE COPIES***

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PRINGLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?