CITY OF TALLAHASSEE v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and CITY OF TALLAHASSEE FLORIDA |
MCKESSON CORPORATION, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., MALLINCKRODT LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., MALLINCKRODT PLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., ALLERGAN PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ACTAVIS LLC, Cardinal Health, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, LTD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noramco, Inc., ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, PURDUE PHARMA LP, ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, CEPHALON INC, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, PURDUE PHARMA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC, PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY INC, NORAMCO INC, CARDINAL HEALTH INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS INC |
4:2018cv00484 |
October 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
MICHAEL J FRANK |
MARK E WALKER |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Interdistrict Transfer to the Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland Division located at Carl B. Stokes U.S. Court House 801 West Superior Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44113 re: MDL 2804 (amm) |
Filing 6 CERTIFIED CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-65) re MDL 2804 to Northern District of Ohio. (Attachments: #1 E-mail Request) (amm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC FILING AND ATTORNEY ADMISSIONS REQUIREMENT (emailed to attorneys J. Burton LeBlanc IV, Paul T. Farrell Jr., Michael J. Fuller Jr., James C. Peterson and Anthony J. Majestro) (ckm) |
Filing 3 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT TO ATTORNEY PETER MOUGEY re #1 Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet: Counsel is advised by this entry that a Civil Cover Sheet should be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents." Please refile the document immediately. For future case openings, please review the procedures for opening a civil case in the "Guide: Civil Case Opening By Attorneys" and/or Chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide" (both available on the clerk's website). (Click on CM/ECF link and go to General Info.) (ckm) |
Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT TO ATTORNEY PETER MOUGEY Re #1 Complaint: The parties named in the above-referenced document were added to the docket incorrectly and will be corrected by the clerk. Party names (including aliases) are to be added using all caps and no punctuation. For future reference, please review the procedures for adding/creating new parties in the "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing" and/or Chapter 10 of the "CM/ECF Attorney User's Guide" (both available on the clerk's website) at www.flnd.uscourts.gov. (Click on CM/ECF link and go to General Info.) (ckm) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (ckm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4319270.), filed by CITY OF TALLAHASSEE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (MOUGEY, PETER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.