QUAM, et al. v. PRINGLE
| FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and BOB QUAM |
| GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV |
| 4:2018cv00557 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| CHARLES J KAHN |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Recommended that Pringle's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. #2 ) be GRANTED for the limited purpose of remanding this case to state court. That Gadsden County Circuit Court Case No. 18-409MHA be REMANDED to the state court from which it was removed. That the clerk be directed to close the file. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR on 1/10/2019. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/7/2019. (sdw) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se litigant GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV. (sdw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV. (sdw) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GEORGE K C PRINGLE, IV. (sdw) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN, JR notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Notice of Removal. Referred to CHARLES J KAHN, JR. (sdw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
