HOWARD v. GDB CAPITAL GROUP et al
Mr. PHILLIP TIMOTHY HOWARD and JENNIFER HOWARD |
barry ryan chapman, douglas john dehaan, gayle dehaan, innovative returns llc, antonio cortez henderson, providence capital holdings, gdb capital group, JEFF GALLOWAY, gary brotherton, jr, jeffrey galloway real estate inc, Mr ADDYS T. WALKER, new edge management, llc, linda bedell, sheila henderson, gorham investments, inc and jeff kahn |
4:2019cv00049 |
January 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
MARK E WALKER |
Other Fraud |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 DOCKET ANNOTATION BY COURT: To ATTORNEY PHILLIP HOWARD re: #1 Complaint. Party names (including aliases) are to be added using all caps and no punctuation. (See "Style Guide for Electronic Case Filing," available on Clerk's website.) The party names will be corrected by the clerk. Further, counsel is advised by this entry, that a Civil Cover Sheet must be filed as a separate entry using the event selection "Civil Cover Sheet" which is found under "Other Filings" under "Other Documents". PLEASE FILE THE CIVIL COVER SHEET. (cle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4384882.), filed by PHILLIP TIMOTHY HOWARD. (HOWARD, PHILLIP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.