HOUTSMA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
| STATE OF FLORIDA |
| JOHN HOUTSMA |
| 4:2019cv00131 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| WILLIAM STAFFORD |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT pursuant to #5 Order OF DISMISSAL. The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "This case is dismissed." The clerk must close the file. 90 Day Exhibit Return Deadline set for 7/24/2019 (blb) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The report and recommendation #4 is accepted and adopted as the court's opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "This case is dismissed." The clerk must close the file. Signed by JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE on 4/25/19. (blb)
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JOHN HOUTSMA - R&R flag set. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the two cases filed pursuant to 2254, 4:19cv131-RH/CAS and 4:19cv132-RH/CAS, be DISMISSED, and the case filed pursuant to 2241, 4:19cv133-RH/CAS, along with any pending motions, be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division, for all further proceedings. This Report and Recommendation shall be docketed in all three cases. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 3/25/19. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/22/2019. (blb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to JUDGE ROBERT L HINKLE and MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS for all further proceedings. SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD, MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK no longer assigned to case. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 3/20/2019. (kjw) **Please use the new judges' initials for all future pleadings: 4:19cv131-RH/CAS.**
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #3 Order Reassigning Case, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. **Action no longer required by Magistrate Judge Frank. (kjw)
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se mailed. (mlp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOHN HOUTSMA. No service copies filed. No fee paid or IFP received. (mlp) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Referred to MICHAEL J FRANK. (mlp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HOUTSMA v. STATE OF FLORIDA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOHN HOUTSMA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
