GLINTON v. INCH et al
Plaintiff: WELLINGTON GLINTON
Defendant: MARK S INCH, JULIE L JONES and JOHN DOE
Case Number: 4:2019cv00239
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: HOPE T CANNON
Referring Judge: ROBERT L HINKLE
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2019 Filing 12 Supplemental MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and Expert Witness. (sdw)
July 19, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #12 Supplemental MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and Expert Witness. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw)
July 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and Appointment of Expert Witness. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/17/2019. (sdw)
July 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Doc. #9 ) is GRANTED. The clerk shall assess Plaintiff $26.00 as an initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days in which to submit the initial partial filing fee. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order with the appropriate cover letter to the Department of Corrections. (Initial Fee due by 8/16/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/17/2019. (order w/ letter to DOC) (sdw)
July 15, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WELLINGTON GLINTON. (sdw)
July 15, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF Doc. #6 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until July 29, 2019, to comply with the May 28 Order by either paying the $400.00 filing fee or filing a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (IFP motion/Fee due by 7/29/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 7/2/2019. (sdw)
July 1, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by WELLINGTON GLINTON to: Florida State Prison, PO Box 800, Raiford FL 32083. (sdw)
July 1, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time by WELLINGTON GLINTON. (sdw)
July 1, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #6 MOTION for Extension of Time. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw)
June 28, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order. (IFP motion/Filing fee not received) (sdw)
June 12, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and Appointment of Expert Witness by WELLINGTON GLINTON. (sdw)
June 12, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and Appointment of Expert Witness. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw)
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by WELLINGTON GLINTON. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a complete set of forms needed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (for prisoners). Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either file a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $400.00 filing fee. (IFP motion/Fee due by 6/27/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON on 5/28/2019. (form to Pla) (sdw)
May 24, 2019 Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se litigant WELLINGTON GLINTON. (sdw)
May 24, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOPE T CANNON notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to HOPE T CANNON. (sdw)
May 23, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WELLINGTON GLINTON. (sdw)
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE (WARDEN TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION), JOHN DOE (WARDEN SUMTER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION), MARK S INCH, and JULIE L JONES filed by WELLINGTON GLINTON. (no service copies) (sdw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GLINTON v. INCH et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WELLINGTON GLINTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK S INCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JULIE L JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?