CHESTNUT v. CANADY et al
| CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT |
| JOHN TOMASINO, CLERK FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, CHARLES CANADY, BARBARA LAGOA, CARLOS MUNIZ, JORGE LABARGA, ROBERT LUCK, C ALAN LAWSON, JOHN A TOMASINO and RICKY POLSTON |
| 4:2019cv00271 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| MICHAEL J FRANK |
| ROBERT L HINKLE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (erl) |
Filing 2
ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT. The clerk of court shall issue a summons for each Defendant and send the summonses to Plaintiff. The clerk shall also send Plaintiff a copy of the waiver of service forms (an AO-398 form and an AO-399 form) for his use. Plaintiff is responsible for prompt service of a summons and a copy of the complaint upon each Defendant. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK on 7/9/2019. (erl)**Forms provided as instructed**
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J FRANK notified that action is needed Re: #1 Complaint. (jcw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CHARLES CANADY, JORGE LABARGA, BARBARA LAGOA, C ALAN LAWSON, ROBERT LUCK, CARLOS MUNIZ, RICKY POLSTON, JOHN A TOMASINO (Filing fee $400, Receipt #FLN4-36947), filed by CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT. (No service copies filed.) (jcw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
